Home   Forums   Search   Login   Register   Member List  
       

  Viewing User Profile for: Soulforger
 About  Contact
Joined: 05-03-2003 12:00 AM
Last Activity: 06-29-2003 05:03 PM
Website:
Location: Unavailable to anonymous users.
Occupation: Unavailable to anonymous users.
Interests: Unavailable to anonymous users.
Signature:
Email: Unavailable to anonymous users.
MSN IM: Unavailable to anonymous users.
AIM: Unavailable to anonymous users.
Yahoo IM: Unavailable to anonymous users.
ICQ: Unavailable to anonymous users.
Send PM
 Post Statistics
Soulforger has contributed to 16 out of 62,996 total posts (0.03% of total).
Most Recent Posts:
Re: ModUpdate: Death & Bleeding 5/20/2003 3:26:46 AM   (Total replies: 1)
I also took it as meaning no chance for a natural stabilisation. Being healed (or even regeneration hopefully) would fix you up.

Re: ModUpdate: Death & Bleeding 5/21/2003 2:18:21 AM   (Total replies: 1)
Have to agree with Noggin that this system will only add to the motivation to party. I have really missed the bleeding system in a lot of the last mods I have played. I think this adds something great.

[No Subject] 6/30/2003 12:37:16 AM   (Total replies: 0)
Huzzah. My elven bower/rapier master is called "Taliesin Pen Annwyn".

[No Subject] 6/30/2003 12:37:18 AM   (Total replies: 0)
I see the problem with removing item level restrictions is the level 1 characters running around with Boots of Speed etc their friends give them. I know this could be policed but it depends how much time you guys would want to spend policing.

[No Subject] 6/30/2003 12:37:14 AM   (Total replies: 0)
Traps, fines, jails, contract killing, duels, drows.... bah!! I do not see a place for any PvP attacks that take place outside of DM supervision. The ENTIRE point of Neverwinter Nights (and D&D) is that people come together to Roleplay and WORK TOGETHER as a team to achieve common goals. That is the only way to ensure all people are having FUN. Frankly I think that this is a decision to be made by the team behind Vives as it forms such an integral base for the module. That's my 2 ...

[No Subject] 6/30/2003 12:37:15 AM   (Total replies: 0)
Ha, that topic title sure suckered me. I thought "who on earth could be leaving already and why?..."

[No Subject] 6/30/2003 12:37:14 AM   (Total replies: 0)
1. I too would like to see some way that a stolen item can be returned if the thief is identified (and "caught") as the perpetrator. Without direct help from a DM controlled guard I don't see how this could work though. 2. There should certainly be a limit to the size of a PP'able item. Lifting a greataxe is implausable. 3. Fen's lockbox sounds great. Perhaps limit it to one per player. [I have seen this idea before in a version of Nordock mod where anything in the box was not ...

[No Subject] 6/30/2003 12:37:10 AM   (Total replies: 0)
But if you are starting a new character then they haven't seen the intro before. ;) I think for the time that must have been spent making the intro it's worth seeing again.

[No Subject] 6/30/2003 12:37:10 AM   (Total replies: 0)
I think you are onto a good thing with those ideas Kell. An item's value can only be measured by the time, pain and adventure it took to get the item in the first place.

[No Subject] 6/30/2003 12:37:10 AM   (Total replies: 0)
There should certainly be some way to "attempt" to retrieve your lost item/s if you detect the Pick Pocket. Attacking the thief is never justice (and probably not justified if in a town with no-weapons rules). Also, perhaps the "You have lost an item" lines could be more explicit saying "You have detected Duke taking 5 gold" or "You were just caught with your hand in Aria's pocket...run".

Search for more...